Take me out to coffee and I'll tell you.
I drink decaf americanos with a bit of cream
And yes, I actually read it.
No seriously, I suck at book reviews (if you'd like a good one, go here)...so sorry, but no written book review here. But, since I know you're interested...
Here are a few hyper short and general reflections:
- Rob Bell's style annoys me (so many questions, so few answers) but it's nothing to crucify the man over. Over coffee, ask me about this.
- Rob Bell is no universalist. Well, he may be...but his book doesn't suggest it.
- Love Wins is not a systematic theology of the doctrine of hell. And if I ever see people quoting his book, Love Wins, in their MDiv eschatology papers....I'm going to have a hernia.
- Rob Bell was very right (wonderfully right) and very wrong (frustratingly wrong) on key biblical passages. Welcome to theology.
- Love Wins has very real implications for how we live our lives...and while I heartily disagree with a few of Bell's key conclusions (can I call them that?) all the internet/twitter hoopla seems....well, silly.
In the meantime...here are a few resources for you that I've read and found helpful over the years regarding eschatology (the theology that deals with "last things"):
Some good books:
- Crockett, William (ed). Four Views on Hell. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992.
- Grenz, Stanley J. The Millennial Maze. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1992.
- Travis, Stephen. I Believe in the Second Coming of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1982
- Packer, J.I. Concise Theology. Wheaton: Tyndale, 1993.
- Moltmann, Jurgen. Theology of Hope. London: SCM, 1967
Some other reflections on Rob Bell's Love Wins:
As a final note...I'm seriously considering for the next four days describing the four most common methods of understanding the nature of hell, based on the Biblical text: The Literal View, The Metaphorical View, The Purgatorial View, and the Conditional View. The reflections won't be super long (maybe like 300 words each)....but they might help you understand why there is a theological discussion. It also might help you decide what the biblical text is actually saying and not saying...which is the goal...right?
- A summary of the internet's pre-book release uproar and condemnation of Rob Bell as a universalist
- Richard Mouw, President of Fuller Seminary, article on "The orthodoxy of Rob Bell"
- Christianity Today book review of Love Wins
- Ben Witherington on Hell in response to Love Wins
- Scott Mcknight's two part blog post on Love Wins and the doctrine of hell, part 1 and part 2
As a final note...I'm seriously considering for the next four days describing the four most common methods of understanding the nature of hell, based on the Biblical text: The Literal View, The Metaphorical View, The Purgatorial View, and the Conditional View. The reflections won't be super long (maybe like 300 words each)....but they might help you understand why there is a theological discussion. It also might help you decide what the biblical text is actually saying and not saying...which is the goal...right?
1 comment:
Do it Joe if you can. I'd love to learn about the 4 views and 300 words is about right for most of us in your fan world. :)
Post a Comment